GOVERNANCE · DEVRUN · EVIDENCE

Operate AI Execution and Project Control Together

Inside the IRON MIND appliance, local AI execution, DevRun approval, stage gates, audit evidence, delivery packages, collaboration messaging, and SIEM incident detection run in one operating flow.

NIS 12 Controls≈94 / 100IDE 3Alert Rules 30
IRON MIND architecture

Identity

Access and role control stay inside the appliance

Identity and access review are evaluated with the same system that runs AI.

Evidence

Evidence is captured by default

Prompts, outputs, changed artifacts, and review history stay linked to the project.

Control Layer

The solution server handles project control inside the appliance

The solution layer is not a separate SaaS tool. It is the control brain that sits inside the appliance.

Identity and access

Role separation, SSO, and project access stay aligned with the control model.

Evidence capture

AI runs, artifacts, outputs, and operator context are stored as evidence.

Control Points

Control points are placed inside the operating surface

Run AI locally

AI use starts inside the appliance instead of an external API path.

Capture context

Each AI action is linked to artifacts, operators, and project history.

Review before release

Governance and gate checks happen before submission.

Policy Tier

AI usage intensity should be separated by project conditions

Open internal use

Lower-risk work can move with lighter review while still staying inside the appliance boundary.

Controlled delivery work

Project-critical work keeps evidence and approval checkpoints visible.

Restricted work

High-risk work stays under stronger review conditions and tighter submission control.

Operational Screens

Review what people actually decide in the operating surface

Issue management

Issue management

Control decisions become meaningful when issue handling stays connected to project execution.

  • Priority and owner
  • Workflow linkage
  • Delivery impact
AI DevRun

AI DevRun

The control layer records AI use as project evidence rather than a disconnected experiment log.

  • Prompt/output history
  • Changed artifacts
  • Review state
Governance board

Governance board

Governance review is visible inside the operating surface instead of a separate spreadsheet.

  • Exception queue
  • SLA alerts
  • Policy posture
Artifact management

Artifact management

Submission control only works when versions and review state stay visible in the same system.

  • Artifact inventory
  • Version history
  • Review state

Evidence Fields

Evidence fields stay close to project work

  • Prompt and output history
  • Changed artifacts and versions
  • Role and project context
  • Review and approval history

AI runs board

Shows what was asked, generated, and changed in the project.

Governance board

Shows which exceptions and policy gaps still block the next step.

Gate board

Shows which milestone still lacks approval and why.

Artifact and report view

Shows what is ready for review, submission, or audit.

Next Step

Operate AI Execution and Project Control Together

IronMind v1.2.2. Product implementation completeness about 94 / 100, external certifications/audits passed: 0, NIS 12 controls plus mapping/delegation, SIEM, ARIA-256-GCM, mTLS, and 32-container air-gap installation verification.